Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocument2019 Federal TrialGovernment Exhibit 530-RRees used qualified language to identify an abdominal scar in the account photograph and distinguished it from patterned scarring on the left leg, noting that she was not a medical examiner. The court allowed a glossy, unredacted copy to be passed among jurors because details were difficult to see on the displayed copy. In closing, Penza referred to Exhibit 530-R as appendectomy records.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Government Exhibit 530-R

Rees used qualified language to identify an abdominal scar in the account photograph and distinguished it from patterned scarring on the left leg, noting that she was not a medical examiner. The court allowed a glossy, unredacted copy to be passed among jurors because details were difficult to see on the displayed copy. In closing, Penza referred to Exhibit 530-R as appendectomy records.

2 proceedings2 mentions1 trial
Also known as (3)
  • Camila's appendectomy records
  • 530-R
  • Account photograph examined for an abdominal scar and patterned scarring on the left leg

About

Penza cited Exhibit 530-R in closing while arguing that the scar comparison placed the Studies photographs before Camila turned 17.

Trial Record (2)