Day 9 - May 20, 2019
Lauren Salzman testified about DOS secrecy, branding, collateral-backed obedience and false denials of Raniere's involvement. The court excluded three collateral-return emails but allowed related questioning. Later confrontation and recording-authentication disputes remained unresolved.
Full day summary
2. Lauren Salzman — Direct (Part 2)
Lauren Salzman continued her direct testimony about DOS’s rules, collateral and branding, her recruitment of other women, and Keith’s directions to conceal his involvement after DOS became public.
Highlights
Lauren Salzman — Directtestimony highlightSalzman described instructions to conceal Keith's role and initials, and explained how collateral backed lifetime obedience and secrecy.Lauren Salzman — Direct“It -- it was total nondisclosure, so complete secrecy about anything happening in the group and a lifetime vow of obedience to your master.”— Lauren SalzmanStates the scope of the DOS commitment in Salzman's own words.Lauren Salzman — DirectadmissionSalzman reconsidered her recruits' branding, acknowledging that she concealed Keith's initials and that their collateral-backed obedience complicated her earlier belief that participation was consensual.Lauren Salzman — DirectadmissionSalzman acknowledged linking Audrey's DOS compliance to ESP promotion, while explaining that DOS was not actually a promotion requirement.Lauren Salzman — Direct“More important, DOS was never a requirement for promotion in ESP and it should not have been factored into promotion in ESP, but I linked them in this conversation.”— Lauren SalzmanAcknowledges using ESP promotion in a conversation about DOS compliance without claiming a formal organizational requirement.Lauren Salzman — Directtestimony highlightSalzman testified that Keith directed false denials of his involvement after DOS became public and supplied alternative explanations for the brand and seduction assignments.
3. Crawford Objection and DOS Recording Authentication
After the jury left, Agnifilo raised a Crawford objection, and counsel disputed authentication of four recordings. The court left both issues unresolved pending review and consultation.
Highlights
Crawford Objection and DOS Recording AuthenticationobjectionThe defense raised a confrontation objection to statements attributed to Kristin and Carly. The government argued that the statements explained their effect on recipients, and the court deferred its response pending review of the testimony and a proposed instruction.Crawford Objection and DOS Recording Authenticationprocedural actionCounsel disputed whether Salzman could authenticate four recordings made before she joined DOS. The court directed counsel to confer and report unresolved issues at 9:00 the next morning without deciding admissibility.