Skip to content
locationlocationNew JerseyunknownNew JerseyIn closing argument, prosecutors described NXIVM's civil case against Stephanie Franco as having been transferred to federal court in New Jersey in 2006. Citing testimony and production correspondence, they argued that videotapes were altered at Raniere's direction and then produced in that litigation as unedited.
← All Locations
Location

New Jersey

In closing argument, prosecutors described NXIVM's civil case against Stephanie Franco as having been transferred to federal court in New Jersey in 2006. Citing testimony and production correspondence, they argued that videotapes were altered at Raniere's direction and then produced in that litigation as unedited.

5 proceedings5 mentions1 trial

About

The New Jersey litigation underlay Racketeering Act 6, which alleged a conspiracy to alter videotapes for use in that federal case and obstruct justice.

Trial Record (5)