Day 22 - June 12, 2019
Financial testimony addressed Cafritz's accounts and the defense trust, whose use the court limited to the enterprise question. Rick Alan Ross faced cross-examination about his reports and contributions. Brian Booth explained photograph metadata and an unresolved timestamp discrepancy, while the court ruled on image exhibits and their display.
Full day summary
1. Richard Guerci — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross (Part 2)
Richard Guerci completed testimony about charges after Pamela Cafritz’s death, Raniere’s handling of checks, and a $14 million defense trust. The court deferred a decision concerning additional border-crossing records.
Highlights
3. Legal-Fee Trust: Charge Conference and Limiting Instruction
The court instructed jurors to consider evidence of Clare Bronfman’s $14 million legal-fee trust only in deciding whether an enterprise existed.
Highlights
4. Rick Alan Ross — Direct (Part 1)
Rick Alan Ross testified about Sutton-family interventions, published criticism of ESP, NXIVM’s civil lawsuit, and private records he received. The court directed case-specific questioning after a defense objection to his general opinions.
3 sidebars inside this proceeding
- Juror Seeking the Judge’s AttentionCounsel alerted the judge that a juror appeared to be seeking attention during sidebar.
- Objection to Witness Opinions Without Expert NoticeAgnifilo objected that the witness was giving expert opinions without notice, while Hajjar argued that his views explained his actions leading to the lawsuit.
- Forbes Article Prejudice and Relevance ObjectionThe defense challenged a Forbes article as irrelevant and prejudicial, while prosecutors offered it to explain subsequent events rather than prove its statements true.
Highlights
5. Rick Alan Ross — Cross/Redirect (Part 2)
Rick Alan Ross's cross-examination covered his Sutton family intervention work, critical NXIVM reports, civil litigation, and Bronfman checks. Brief redirect addressed a folder containing his personal information and litigation contributions before he was excused.
Highlights
6. Brian Booth — Direct
FBI examiner Brian Booth explained recovered photograph metadata and a timestamp discrepancy. The judge admitted specified adult images over the defense’s objection.
2 sidebars inside this proceeding
- Defense Objection to Adult Sexual ImagesDefense counsel challenged adult sexual images as prejudicial, duplicative, and unrelated to the charges, raised a foundation objection concerning Lauren Salzman, and declined to object to the report itself.
- Objection to Adult Images, Not MetadataThe defense challenged adult images, but not their metadata, as unnecessary and remote from DOS, while the government argued they supported the timeline and alleged course of conduct.