Skip to content
personpersonEdgar BronfmanEdgar BronfmanChairman and chief executive of Seagram and father of Clare Bronfman.← All People
Mentioned

Edgar Bronfman

Chairman and chief executive of Seagram and father of Clare Bronfman.

19 proceedings·19 mentions

About

Daniela described Edgar Bronfman as the target of email surveillance underlying an identity-theft racketeering allegation. She testified that Raniere requested access to his account, that she prepared spyware for his daughter Clare, and that she obtained his credentials and passed selected emails to Raniere, directly or through Kristin Keeffe. She did not witness Clare's reported physical installation of the software. November 2008 emails addressed Raniere's requests for updates and Daniela's report that she no longer had access. On cross-examination, Daniela said she did not believe Raniere personally accessed Bronfman's account. The defense later disputed proof that he received the surveillance results.

Stephen Herbits described arranging public-relations assistance for Clare and Sarah Bronfman at their father's request. He also identified an admitted email in which Edgar Bronfman denied supporting Rick Ross. During Ross's cross-examination, defense counsel displayed three Bronfman checks totaling $12,500. Ross connected one $5,000 check to legal costs in the Landmark Education litigation; he did not recall the other two and offered fundraising-related explanations. Separately, the court allowed a Forbes article quoting Bronfman's concern that ESP was a cult, with a limiting instruction. Its admitted purpose was to explain participants' subsequent actions, not to establish that characterization as true.

Trial Record (19)

2019 Trial2019 Federal TrialMay 7, 2019 – Oct 27, 2020

Edgar Bronfman appeared in testimony and exhibits as the target of alleged email surveillance underlying an identity-theft racketeering allegation. His correspondence and contributions to Rick Ross also figured in disputes over NXIVM's critics.

Day 7

DirectStephen Herbits — DirectStephen HerbitsMark Lesko1highlightMentioned

Summary

Herbits described refusing requests to approach prosecutors and stop NXIVM press coverage. Six email exhibits documented requests for help against critics and his responses.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightAfter Edgar Bronfman's denial of supporting Rick Ross was read, Herbits described checking an allegation about Birthright-related funding and receiving an answer that no payments to Ross had been made.Open in transcript →

Day 8

Day 13

DirectDaniela — DirectDanielaMoira Kim Penza1highlightMentioned

Summary

Daniela described hacking accounts at Keith's direction, delivering captured information, immigration dependency and unpaid work. Emails and a compilation of captured computer data were admitted.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightDaniela distinguished what she had heard about Clare's installation of software on Edgar Bronfman's computer from her own observation of incoming data and acquisition of his email credentials.Open in transcript →

Day 16

Day 19

DirectNicole — DirectNicoleMoira Kim PenzaMentioned

Summary

Nicole described sexual encounters she linked to DOS obedience and collateral, required photographs, unpaid work, branding, and her eventual departure. Emails and other records were admitted, and the court addressed objections to secondhand statements.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 22

Day 23

Day 24

Day 26

Day 27

Jury InstructionFinal Jury InstructionsMentioned

Summary

The court delivered the final charge on seven counts and eleven alleged racketeering acts, then explained unanimity, verdict forms, and deliberation rules.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 28

Day 29

ProceduralVictim Impact StatementsMentioned

Summary

Fifteen victim statements described sexual abuse, coercive control, retaliation and lasting harm. Several requested life imprisonment. The judge also asked about Kristin Keeffe's child-support negotiations before recessing for sentencing arguments.

Mentioned in this proceeding.